Free Essays on Nietzsche

In Nietzsche’s philosophy he made no room for God, let alone religion itself. Nietzsche saw religion, especially Christianity, as a weakness. A Burden put on man to cloud the mind with thoughts of another world in order to justify their meager existence in this one. When used as a tool of education or cultivation, religion could be useful just as politics or economics (Cowan72). The problem arises when religions do not want to be used as a tool for education, â€Å"but insist on having their own sovereign way†. They believe that they are not the means to any kind of end, but rather the end itself. Religion can be an intellectual journey, but it cannot be allowed to become the destination to which we are all struggling to arrive. (Cowan 74). This can only serve to downplay the role of man in the universe, a role that is already dangerously insignificant. In the eyes of Nietzsche Christianity has many sacrifices, these sacrifices are made for someone or something th at only exists in the man- written accounts of the Bible. Nietzsche saw Christianity as an endless cycle of sacrifice. Not by any means sacrifice for the better good, nor for any kind of enlightenment, but rather sacrifice for the pure sake of sacrifice. What good could possibly come of this? I believe he would be quick to answer the question. With the exception of a somewhat Hobbesean premise of being â€Å"one more means for overcoming resistances, for the ability to rule† (Cowan 72) and giving â€Å"some of the ruled the instruction and opportunity to prepare themselves for future ruling and obeying† (Cowan 73), no good can come of this. Nietzsche makes his dislike for Christianity quite evident, and I believe rightly so, for it serves as a lifelong scapegoat for the man who knows worldly failure. This same man who may fail to hold on to employment in the temporal world, for it seems that economic prosperity is anti-Christian, or who can’t ‘turn the other ch... Free Essays on Nietzsche Free Essays on Nietzsche Nietzsche claims that we live in an historical age that is â€Å" beyond good and evil.† We are no longer restricted or limited by moral authorities and hence possess a new freedom and creativity. Citing works we have covered, what is the political promise and danger arising from the teaching that morality is a myth? Does the realization that we are â€Å"beyond good and evil† benefit and fulfill man? Why or Why not? If not, what else is necessary? Finally, given the readings, are you hopeful about the future? Why? Nietzsche believes that no history can be defined and claims that there is no such thing as something that has no history. Through examining Nietzsche it becomes evident that searching for the definition of species is not only futile but also unnecessary. This definition is something that he believes changes over time, without any permanent lasting and stable reality. Unlike Hobbes Nietzsche believed that our value systems are culturally determined, they arise not from conventional folk wisdom. His relationship with the truth has nothing to do with the meaning of a moral system. Humans described by Nietzsche are like human culture and have a history. We have a personal history were we ourselves cannot be defined, we continue to be a constant process of becoming, and or transcending the person we have been into something new. Many might feel that we are defined by some essential quality when in fact we are constantly being defined by other factors. Nietzshe states that humans believ e they must create their own system or become enslaved by another man's system. The lives of the human must be lived in solitude from others, we choose to create our own horizon. In comparison with Marx, he believes that the material forces of production and division of labor control the process of transformation of the individual self and ideas. This is said to be the logic behind the creation of history through Marx. Through the creation of h... Free Essays on Nietzsche In Nietzsche’s philosophy he made no room for God, let alone religion itself. Nietzsche saw religion, especially Christianity, as a weakness. A Burden put on man to cloud the mind with thoughts of another world in order to justify their meager existence in this one. When used as a tool of education or cultivation, religion could be useful just as politics or economics (Cowan72). The problem arises when religions do not want to be used as a tool for education, â€Å"but insist on having their own sovereign way†. They believe that they are not the means to any kind of end, but rather the end itself. Religion can be an intellectual journey, but it cannot be allowed to become the destination to which we are all struggling to arrive. (Cowan 74). This can only serve to downplay the role of man in the universe, a role that is already dangerously insignificant. In the eyes of Nietzsche Christianity has many sacrifices, these sacrifices are made for someone or something th at only exists in the man- written accounts of the Bible. Nietzsche saw Christianity as an endless cycle of sacrifice. Not by any means sacrifice for the better good, nor for any kind of enlightenment, but rather sacrifice for the pure sake of sacrifice. What good could possibly come of this? I believe he would be quick to answer the question. With the exception of a somewhat Hobbesean premise of being â€Å"one more means for overcoming resistances, for the ability to rule† (Cowan 72) and giving â€Å"some of the ruled the instruction and opportunity to prepare themselves for future ruling and obeying† (Cowan 73), no good can come of this. Nietzsche makes his dislike for Christianity quite evident, and I believe rightly so, for it serves as a lifelong scapegoat for the man who knows worldly failure. This same man who may fail to hold on to employment in the temporal world, for it seems that economic prosperity is anti-Christian, or who can’t ‘turn the other ch...